Docs
MethodologiesAMS-III.FBOLD Carbon (CH₄) - MvF

BOLD Carbon (CH₄) Framework

BOLD Carbon (CH₄) framework specification — verification rules and requirements for prevented methane emissions through composting.

Framework summary

PropertyValue
MethodologyAMS-III.F
Version1.0.2
StatusPublished
Credit typeCarbon Credit
TokenTCC (C-CARB.CH4) — issued by this methodology
External referenceUNFCCC AMS-III.F v12.0

Scope

The BOLD Carbon (CH₄) MvF defines verification procedures for preventing methane emissions through composting organic waste that would otherwise decompose in landfills:

  • Waste types: Food waste, green waste (garden, yard, and park trimmings), sludge from waste treatment plants, tobacco industry residues, and other organic subtypes classified under CDM waste codes
  • Treatment: Aerobic composting at professional facilities
  • Geography: Currently operational in Brazil, with the framework designed to be expandable to other regions
  • Environmental claim: Prevented CO2e emissions from methane avoidance

Eligibility criteria

Participants must meet the same accreditation requirements as BOLD Recycling:

  • Waste generators — Must be identified with valid documentation.
  • Haulers — Required for truck and boat transport; optional for sludge pipe and cart collection.
  • Processors — Exactly one processor must be identified per MassID.
  • Recyclers — Exactly one recycler (composting facility) must be identified with valid accreditation dates.
  • Network Integrators — Must have valid accreditation dates.

Verification requirements

BOLD Carbon (CH₄) includes all the verification checks present in BOLD Recycling, plus additional checks specific to emission quantification:

  • All shared checks — Document validation, actor identification, event validation, geolocation, manifests, compliance, and integrity (see BOLD Recycling Framework)
  • Emissions calculation — The prevented-emissions rule quantifies CO2e prevented using the UNFCCC AMS-III.F methodology
  • Project boundary — The project-boundary rule validates the geographic distance between pick-up and drop-off locations

Baseline scenario and emission factors

BOLD Carbon (CH₄) references the UNFCCC AMS-III.F v12.0 methodology for emission calculations:

  • Baseline scenario — Organic waste decomposing anaerobically in a landfill, generating methane (CH4)
  • Project scenario — The same organic waste composted aerobically, preventing methane generation
  • Emission factors — Static factors are used for most organic waste subtypes. For waste classified under CDM code 8.7D ("Others, if organic"), dynamic factors are applied based on Ibama waste classification codes.

The prevented-emissions rule applies the formula: prevented CO2e equals the mass of composted waste multiplied by the prevented emissions factor per ton, minus the mass multiplied by the exceeding emission coefficient.

Scientific basis

The following standards provide the scientific foundation for emission calculations and waste classification in BOLD Carbon (CH₄):

UNFCCC Clean Development Mechanism

ReferenceVersionDescription
AMS-III.Fv12.0"Avoidance of methane emissions through composting" — the basis for the prevented-emissions rule. Defines emission factors and calculation procedures for quantifying prevented CH₄ from composting organic waste.
CDM Tool 04v8.0"Emissions from solid waste disposal sites" — provides methodologies for estimating methane emissions from landfill disposal, used as the baseline scenario in emission avoidance calculations.
CDM Tool 13v2.0"Project and leakage emissions from composting" — defines procedures for estimating project emissions and leakage from composting activities.

IPCC

ReferenceYearDescription
IPCC AR52013Fifth Assessment Report — provides Global Warming Potential (GWP) values used in emission calculations. The GWP for methane (CH₄) is used to convert prevented methane emissions to CO₂e.

Regional standards

ReferenceJurisdictionDescription
Ibama Brazilian List of Solid WasteBrazilOfficial waste classification system used by the regional-waste-classification rule. Maps waste types to CDM waste codes for emission factor selection.

Emission calculation parameters

Baseline emissions — CDM Tool 04 v8.0

For calculating methane emissions from landfills and dump sites, BOLD Carbon (CH₄) uses UNFCCC CDM Tool 04 v8.0 — "Emissions from Solid Waste Disposal Sites."

ParameterValueDescription
φ0.85Model correction factor for model uncertainties
f0.00 (scenarios 1, 3) / 0.45 (scenario 2)Fraction of methane captured and flared
GWP_CH₄28Global Warming Potential of methane (IPCC AR5, 2013)
OX0.1Oxidation factor (methane oxidized in soil covering)
F0.5Fraction of methane in landfill gas (volume)
DOC_f0.5Fraction of degradable organic carbon that decomposes
MCF1.0 (scenarios 1, 2) / 0.8 (scenario 3)Methane correction factor
DOC_j (food)0.15Degradable organic carbon fraction — food waste
DOC_j (green)0.20Degradable organic carbon fraction — green waste
K_j (food)0.40Decay rate — food waste (1/yr, wet tropical climate)
K_j (green)0.17Decay rate — green waste (1/yr, wet tropical climate)

Three baseline scenarios are supported:

  1. Landfill without methane flaring — Highest emissions (f = 0)
  2. Landfill with methane flaring — Moderate emissions (f = 0.45, ~50% capture at 90% burn efficiency)
  3. Dump site — Intermediate emissions (MCF = 0.8)

Real emissions — CDM Tool 13 v2.0

For calculating emissions during composting, BOLD Carbon (CH₄) uses UNFCCC CDM Tool 13 v2.0 — "Project and Leakage Emissions from Composting."

ParameterValueDescription
EF_CH₄2.0 g/kg wasteMethane emission factor per kg composted
EF_N₂O0.2 g/kg wasteNitrous oxide emission factor per kg composted
GWP_CH₄28Global Warming Potential of methane (IPCC AR5, 2013)
GWP_N₂O265Global Warming Potential of nitrous oxide (IPCC AR5, 2013)

Default emission factors are for "Fresh Weight" (gross weight including water content). Additional factors for fossil fuel and electricity consumption apply but are not shown in the simplified formula.

Calculation example

For a composting facility using a 50/50 food waste to green waste ratio, comparing composting to landfill without methane capture:

MetricValue
Baseline Emissions (BE)2.451 tons CO₂e
Real Emissions from composting (RE)0.218 tons CO₂e
Avoided Emissions (AE)2.233 tons CO₂e

This means composting 1 ton of food waste + 1 ton of green waste avoids approximately 2.2 tons of CO₂e over a 20-year period compared to landfill disposal.

Comparison across disposal methods

Disposal methodTotal 20-year emissionsAvoided vs. composting
Landfill without flaring2.451 tons CO₂e2.233 tons CO₂e
Dump site1.961 tons CO₂e1.743 tons CO₂e
Landfill with flaring1.348 tons CO₂e1.130 tons CO₂e
Composting0.218 tons CO₂e

In every scenario, composting 1 ton of organic waste avoids more than 1 ton of CO₂e emissions.

Supported waste codes

BOLD Carbon validates waste materials against the Brazilian List of Solid Waste published by Ibama (IN nº 13, December 18, 2012) and maps each Ibama code to a CDM waste category from CDM Tool 04 v08.1. This mapping is enforced at submission time by the regional-waste-classification rule — see the Rules catalog and the Waste Classification reference for additional context.

CDM waste categories

The methodology supports 216 Ibama codes across the following CDM categories:

CDM CodeCategorySupported codes
8.1Wood and wood products8
8.2Pulp, paper and cardboard (other than sludge)8
8.3Food, food waste, beverages and tobacco (other than sludge)12
8.4Textiles5
8.5Garden, yard and park waste1
8.6Glass, plastic, metal, other inert waste47
8.7BIndustrial Sludge14
8.7CDomestic Sludge26
8.7DOthers (if organic)95

Ibama code reference

Expand each category below to see the accepted Ibama codes. The Ibama Code is the value to send as LOCAL_WASTE_CLASSIFICATION_ID; the Description is validated against LOCAL_WASTE_CLASSIFICATION_DESCRIPTION.

For codes under CDM 8.7D where % Carbon is not listed, the recycler must specify the waste type and/or provide a laboratory report. The carbon fraction is used by the prevented-emissions rule (rule 21) to calculate dynamic emission factors — see Baseline scenario and emission factors.

Key parameters

ParameterValue
Composting cycle timeframeValidated between DROP_OFF and RECYCLED events
Geolocation toleranceParticipant addresses validated against accredited addresses
Project boundaryDistance between first PICK_UP and last DROP_OFF validated
Document unitKilograms (kg)
Document typeOrganic
Project periodRECYCLED event must occur on or after January 1st of the previous year

Validation rules

See the BOLD Carbon (CH₄) Application Rules catalog for the complete list of validation rules, grouped by category with descriptions.

Downloads

Feedback: method@carrot.eco


Framework rules

Framework rules define what must be verified in the BOLD Carbon (CH₄) methodology. Each framework rule specifies a validation requirement at the specification level.

These rules are implemented by one or more application rules that contain the executable validation logic. The mapping is not one-to-one: a single application rule may satisfy multiple framework rules, and a framework rule may require multiple application rules to fully verify.

Showing 56 of 56 rules
Structural: 26Methodology: 13Audit: 17
1

Audit Eligibility Check

Validates that the 'Recycled' event occurred within the timeframe allowed by the methodology. The event must have occurred on or after January 1st of the previous year.

Methodology reference: 10.2 Allowable Project Period

Methodology
2

Check Participants Accreditation

Validates that all participants involved in the supply chain are accredited by the Carrot system. Verifies that accreditation documents exist and that their due dates have not expired.

Audit
3

TCC Absence

Verifies that the MassID document does not already have a carbon credit event linked to it, ensuring no double counting of carbon credits (TCC).

Methodology reference: 3.4.2 Avoidance of Double-Counting

Methodology
4

Project Size

Checks the 'Project Size' metadata field in the Recycler's accreditation page. CO2e emission reductions must not exceed 60,000 metric tons (60 kt) over a 12-month period for the MassID to be eligible for TCC generation.

Methodology reference: 3.2.1 Participant Eligibility

Methodology
5

Document Value

Verifies that the document has a value greater than zero. The document value represents the weight of the mass registered on the platform.

Audit
6

Document Measurement Unit

Verifies that the document's measurement unit is kilograms (kg), the standard unit adopted by the Carrot Platform.

Audit
7

Document Category

Verifies that the document is declared with the 'MassID' category, as required by the BOLD methodologies for mass verification.

Audit
8

Document Type

Verifies that the document type is declared as 'Organic'. The BOLD Carbon and BOLD Recycling methodologies are designed for organic waste types.

Methodology reference: 1.1 Summary Table

Methodology
9

Document Subtype

Verifies that the MassID organic waste subtype belongs to the group of subtypes approved by the BOLD methodologies, as defined by CDM TOOL04 eligible organic waste type classes.

Methodology reference: 6.2 Baseline Selection

Methodology
10

Local Waste Classification

The 'Pick-up' event must contain a 'Local Waste Classification ID' attribute with a code from the official waste classification of the jurisdiction where the waste was collected, and a 'Local Waste Classification Desc' attribute with the corresponding description. When the country code is 'BR', the fields must match the Brazilian solid waste list from Ibama.

Structural
11

Local Waste Classification x CDM

When the country code of the collection address is 'BR', the 'Local Waste Classification ID' must correspond to an organic waste type from CDM Tool 04, mapped according to the Ibama-CDM correspondence table.

Structural
12

Time Interval Check

The time difference between the 'Drop-Off' and 'Recycled' events must be between 60 and 180 days, ensuring the composting cycle meets quality standards for fertilizer production.

Audit
13

Waste Origin Identified

When the waste origin is unknown, the 'Pick-up' event must contain the 'Waste Origin' metadata set to 'Unidentified'. When the origin is known, this metadata must not be present, indicating the waste generator is identified.

Audit
14

One Waste Source

When the 'Waste Origin' metadata is not declared as 'Unidentified' in the 'Pick-up' event, there must be exactly one 'Waste Generator' actor event, identifying the source of the waste in the supply chain.

Methodology reference: Participants

Methodology
15

First Identified Participant - FIP

The First Identified Participant (also known as primary participant) must be the same participant indicated in the event where the waste was first registered (Pick-up). Validation is performed based on participant IDs.

Structural
16

FIP Address

The address identified in the first registration event (Pick-up) must match the address indicated for the First Identified Participant. Address validation is performed based on registered address IDs.

Structural
17

Recycler Actor

The MassID must contain exactly one 'Recycler' actor event, ensuring there is a single identified recycler responsible for transforming the waste and reintroducing it into the economy.

Structural
18

Hauler Identification

When the 'Vehicle Type' metadata is not 'sludge-pipes' or 'cart', the MassID must contain at least one 'Hauler' actor event identifying the transport participant responsible for moving the waste.

Structural
19

Drop-off Event

A 'Drop-off' event must be declared in the MassID, confirming that the waste was delivered to the correct destination and transferred to the composting facility.

Structural
20

Pick-up Geolocation Precision

In the 'Pick-up' event, the geolocation declared in the 'app-gps-latitude' and 'app-gps-longitude' metadata must be compatible with the event address data, within a 2 km radius. If GPS data is unavailable, validation falls back to the address registered in the accreditation.

Audit
21

Check Recycler and Drop-Off Addresses

At least one 'Drop-off' event must have its 'Responsible Party' address matching the address declared for the 'Recycler' actor event. Address validation is performed based on registered address IDs.

Structural
22

Processor and Drop-Off

When a Drop-Off event has a 'Responsible Party' matching a 'Processor' participant, there must be a subsequent Drop-Off event whose 'Responsible Party' matches the 'Recycler' participant, ensuring the waste is forwarded from the processor to the recycling facility.

Structural
23

Drop-off Geolocation Precision

In the 'Drop-off' event, the geolocation declared in the 'app-gps-latitude' and 'app-gps-longitude' metadata must be compatible with the event address data, within a 2 km radius. If GPS data is unavailable, validation falls back to the address registered in the participant's accreditation.

Audit
24

Receiving Operator Identifier

The 'Drop-off' event must contain the 'Receiving Operator Identifier' metadata, ensuring a responsible operator is registered for receiving the waste at the composting facility, enabling traceability and accountability.

Methodology reference: 9.1 Mass Recording Requirements

Methodology
25

Methodology Distance Limit

Verifies the distance between the 'Pick-up' and 'Drop-off' event geolocations. Distances exceeding 200 km are flagged for review in the Carrot Operations Dashboard, as the project boundary established under UNFCCC AMS-III.F. is 200 km.

Methodology reference: 6.1 Project Boundaries

Methodology
26

Vehicle Type

In a MassID document, the 'Vehicle Type' metadata is mandatory and must be one of the methodology-approved types: Truck, Car, Mini Van, Bicycle, Motorcycle, Cart, Sludge Pipes, Boat, Cargo Ship, or Others.

Structural
27

Vehicle Description

When the 'Vehicle Type' metadata is 'Others' in the 'Pick-up' event, a 'Vehicle Description' metadata must be declared, ensuring all non-standard transport means are properly identified and documented.

Structural
28

Vehicle License Plate

In the 'Pick-up' event, when the 'Vehicle Type' is not 'Sludge Pipes', 'Cart', or 'Bicycle', the 'Vehicle License Plate' metadata must be declared to enable transport tracking and prevent fraud.

Structural
29

Driver Identifier

When the 'Vehicle Type' is not 'Sludge Pipes', the 'Driver Identifier' metadata must be declared. If identified, the 'Internal DriverID' must be provided. If not identified, a 'Reason Dismissal DriverID' justification is required.

Methodology reference: 9.1 Mass Recording Requirements

Methodology
30

Has Transport Manifest

Verifies that the 'Transport Manifest' event is declared in the MassID document, ensuring proof of waste transport is properly documented and traceable.

Methodology reference: 9.4 Processors and the Waste Generator

Methodology
31

Transport Manifest Attachment

When a 'Transport Manifest' event does not have an 'Exemption Justification' metadata, it must contain an attachment named 'Transport Manifest' as documentary proof of transport.

Methodology reference: 9.4 Processors and the Waste Generator

Methodology
32

Transport Manifest Exemption Justification

When a 'Transport Manifest' event does not contain the metadata required by the 'Transport Manifest Fields' rule, an 'Exemption Justification' metadata must be declared with a non-empty value.

Structural
33

Transport Manifest Fields

When a 'Transport Manifest' event has no 'Exemption Justification', the following metadata must be filled: 'Document Type', 'Document Number', 'Document Date Issue', and 'Event Value'. When the Recycler is located in Brazil (country='BR'), the 'Document Type' must be 'MTR'.

Methodology reference: 9.4 Processors and the Waste Generator

Methodology
34

Has Recycling Manifest

Verifies that the 'Recycling Manifest' event is declared in the MassID document, confirming that the waste was effectively processed at a recycling facility.

Structural
35

Recycling Manifest Attachment

When a 'Recycling Manifest' event does not have an 'Exemption Justification' metadata, it must contain an attachment named 'Recycling Manifest'. The required supporting document may vary by country where the recycler is located.

Structural
36

Recycling Manifest Exemption Justification

When a 'Recycling Manifest' event does not contain the metadata required by the 'Recycling Manifest Fields' rule, an 'Exemption Justification' metadata must be declared with a non-empty value.

Structural
37

Recycling Manifest Address

The address declared in the 'Recycling Manifest' event must match the address of the 'Recycler' actor, ensuring the waste was processed at the correct location. Address validation is performed based on registered address IDs.

Structural
38

Recycling Manifest Fields

When a 'Recycling Manifest' event has no 'Exemption Justification', the following metadata must be filled: 'Document Type', 'Document Number', and 'Document Date Issue'. When the Recycler is located in Brazil (country='BR'), the 'Document Type' must be 'CDF'.

Structural
39

Recycling Manifest Value

When a 'Recycling Manifest' event has no 'Exemption Justification', the 'Event Value' metadata must exactly match the 'value' declared in the document, preventing discrepancies in the recycling record.

Audit
40

Weight Capture Method

In the 'WEIGHING' event, the 'Weight Capture Method' metadata must be present with one of the following values: Digital, Photo (Scale+Cargo), Manual, or Transport Manifest.

Structural
41

Scale Type

In the 'WEIGHING' event, the 'Scale Type' metadata must be declared and identified as one of the approved types: Weighbridge, Floor Scale, Pallet Scale, Forklift Scale, Conveyor Belt Scale, Hanging/Crane Scale, Bin Scale, Portable Axle Weigher, Onboard Truck Scale, Precision/Bench Scale, or Two-bin Lateral Scale.

Audit
42

Container Type

In the 'WEIGHING' event, the 'Container Type' metadata must be present with one of the following values: Bag, Bin, Drum, Pail, Street Bin, Waste Box, or Truck.

Structural
43

Scale Accreditation

In the 'WEIGHING' event, the 'Scale Accreditation' metadata must be present with a link to the scale validation event in the accreditation of the participant responsible for weighing.

Audit
44

Weighing Fields

The MassID must have at least one 'WEIGHING' event with the following metadata: 'Gross Weight' (decimal > 0, in kg), 'Container Capacity' (decimal > 0, in KILOGRAM, LITER, or CUBIC_METER), 'Tare' (decimal >= 0, in kg), 'Mass Net Weight' (decimal > 0, in kg), and 'Container Quantity' (integer >= 1, required when Container Type is not 'Truck').

Structural
45

Truck Weighing

In the 'WEIGHING' event, when the 'Container Type' is 'Truck', a 'Vehicle License Plate' attribute must be present.

Structural
46

Weighing in two steps

When a 'WEIGHING' event lacks 'Mass Net Weight' and 'Tare', it must have 'Gross Weight' and 'Container Capacity'. A second 'WEIGHING' event must then follow with matching 'Gross Weight', 'Container Capacity', 'Scale Type', 'Scale Accreditation', 'Container Type', and 'Vehicle License Plate' values, plus all other fields per the 'Weighing Fields' rule.

Structural
47

Net Weight Verification

When a 'WEIGHING' event satisfies the 'Weighing Fields' rule, the following calculation is verified: Mass Net Weight = Gross Weight - (Tare * Container Quantity). If 'Container Quantity' is not provided, a value of 1 is assumed.

Structural
48

Mass Sorting Event

A 'Sorting' event must be declared after all 'Weighing' events in the MassID document.

Structural
49

Sorting Value Field

The 'Sorting' event must contain a 'value' metadata, and the 'value' field of the 'Sorting' event must update the MassID document value.

Structural
50

Sorting Calculation

Verifies that the sorting calculation is correct by executing the equation: document value * (100% - conversion factor) = mass sorting value, and comparing the result with the value declared in the 'Sorting' event.

Audit
51

Double-checking Source Emitted Masses

Checks the monthly waste generation ceiling in the source's accreditation page. If the sum of masses from the same generator in the same month exceeds the ceiling by more than 20%, the MassID is blocked for credit generation until reviewed by the operations department.

Audit
52

Double-checking Recycler Emitted Masses

Checks the operational capacity in the recycler's accreditation page. If the sum of masses processed by the same recycler in the same month exceeds the operational capacity by more than 3%, the MassID is blocked for credit generation until approved by the operations department.

Audit
53

Duplicate Check

Verifies that no other mass documents exist with the same document value, same date and time of receipt at the recycling yard, same generator, and same vehicle. Duplicate documents are rejected to prevent inconsistencies.

Audit
54

GasID Output

Checks the compensation index for the waste type in the recycler's accreditation page and executes the TCC calculation: document-value * compensation index = GasID, ensuring carbon credits are correctly calculated based on waste type and volume.

Methodology reference: 7.4 Project Emission Calculation (PEy)

Methodology
55

Route Check

Verifies that the date, time of the 'Drop-Off' event, and 'vehicle-license-plate' of the audited MassID are unique. If there is a conflict with another MassID, the mass is rejected to prevent duplicate or inconsistent records.

Audit
56

Recycled-to-Input Conversion

Verifies the composting fertilizer coefficient in the recycler's accreditation page and checks whether the declared quantity is compatible with the calculation, ensuring accuracy in recycled-to-input conversion reporting.

Audit

View application rules · Learn about AMS-III.F

On this page